Entry #8: Harsh Initiations

Topic: Dissonance Theory, Harsh initiations


In 1959, Festinger and Carlsmith published their study on dissonance theory. The theory suggests that we have an inner drive to hold all our attitudes and beliefs in harmony to avoid disharmony1. In their study, they asked participants to perform dull tasks, like turning pegs on a peg board. Following the subjects were paid either $1 or $20 to tell the next participant (who was actually a confederate), that the task was really interesting and fun, and almost all of the subjects complied. Afterwards, subjects were asked to evaluate the experiment overall. Those participants that were paid only $1 rated the task as much more interesting than participants who were paid $20 to lie.

They concluded that participants who were paid $20 had sufficient justification to tell the lie; they were doing it for the money. Participants who were only paid $1 did not have the sufficient justification for their actions of lying about the task, so instead there is an attitude change.

The theory of dissonance relies upon the principle of cognitive consistency, that people strive to have consistent attitudes and behaviors. The cognitive dissonance resulting from conflicting attitudes or beliefs and behaviors, is a feeling of discomfort that leads to a change of attitude, belief or behavior, and such action reduces the discomfort.  For participants who were paid $20, the reward for telling the lie led to a condition where dissonance was not present or minimal at most. But participants who were paid only $1, did not have a good reason to lie. Because their actions (the lie) conflicted with their beliefs (that they are good people), they changed, instead, their perception of the task. To relieve the dissonance, the participants came to believe that the task actually was interesting, so they weren’t really telling a lie.

In later years, dissonance has been studies in a variety of social situations including harsh initiations, like hazing or building group cohesion.

One such example of harsh initiation was brought to my attention when I came across the TED talk given by Kakenya Ntaiya in 2012, “A Girl who Demanded School” (full video included at end).

She begins her talk with an image, “There’s a group of people in Kenya. People cross oceans to go see them. These people are tall. They jump high. They wear red. And they kill lions. You might be wondering, who are these people? These are the Maasais. And you know what’s cool? I’m actually one of them.”

The Maasais, they boys are brought up to be warriors. The girls are brought up to be mothers. When I was five years old, I found out that I was engaged to be married as soon as I reached puberty. My mother, my grandmother, my aunties, they constantly reminded me that your husband just passed by. Cool, yeah? And everything I had to do from that moment was to prepare me to be the perfect woman at age 12. My day started at 5 in the morning, milking the cows, sweeping the house, cooking for my siblings, collecting water, firewood. I did everything that I needed to do to become a perfect wife.

I went to school not because the Maasais’ women or girls were going to school. It’s because my mother was denied an education, and she constantly reminded me and my siblings that she never wanted us to live the life she was living…

When I went to school, I had a dream. I wanted to become a teacher. Teachers looked nice. They wear nice dresses, high-heeled shoes. I found out later that they are uncomfortable, but I admired it. But most of all, the teacher was just writing on the board — not hard work, that’s what I thought, compared to what I was doing in the farm. So I wanted to become a teacher.

I worked hard in school, but when I was in eighth grade, it was a determining factor.

In our tradition there is a ceremony that girls have to undergo to become women, and it’s a rite of passage to womanhood.

And then I was just finishing up eighth grade, and that was a transition for me to go to high school. This was the crossroad. Once I go through this tradition, I was going to become a wife. Well, my dream of becoming a teacher will not come to pass. So I talked — I had to come up with a plan to figure these things out. I talked to my father. I did something that most girls have never done. I told my father, “I will only go through this ceremony if you let me go back to school.” The reason why, if I ran away, my father will have a stigma, people will be calling him the father of that girl who didn’t go through the ceremony. It was a shameful thing for him to carry for the rest of his life. So he figured out, “Well,” he said, “Okay, you can go to school after the ceremony.”

I did. The ceremony happened. It’s a whole week long of excitement. It’s a ceremony. People are enjoying it. And the day before the actual ceremony happens, we are dancing, having excitement, and through all the night we did not sleep. The actual day came, and we walked out of the house that we were dancing in. Yes, we danced and danced. We walked into the courtyard, and there were a bunch of people waiting. They were all in a circle. And as we danced and dance, and we approached this circle of women, men, women, children, everybody was there. There was a woman sitting in the middle of it, and this woman was waiting to hold us. I was the first. There were my sisters and a couple of other girls, and as I approached her, she looked at me, and I sat down. And I sat down, and I opened my legs. As I opened my legs, another woman came, and this woman was carrying a knife. And as she carried the knife, she walked toward me and she held the clitoris, and she cut if off. 

As you can imagine, I bled. I bled. And after bleeding for a while, I fainted thereafter. It’s something that so many girls — I’m lucky, I never died — but many die. It’s practiced, it’s no anesthesia, it’s a rusty old knife, and it was difficult. I was lucky because one, also, my mom did something that most women don’t do. Three days later, after everybody has left the home, my mom went and brought a nurse. We were taken care of. Three weeks later, I was healed, and I was back in high school. I was so determined to be a teacher now so that I could make a difference in my family. 

Well, while I was in high school, something happened. I met a young gentleman from our village who had been to the University of Oregon… I told him, “Well, I want to go to where you are.”

And he told me, “Well, what do you mean, you want to go? Don’t you have a husband waiting for you?”

And I told him, “Don’t worry about that part. Just tell me how to get there.”

This gentleman, he helped me. While I was in high school also, my dad was sick. He got a stroke, and he was really, really sick, so he really couldn’t tell me what to do next. But the next problem is, my father is not the only father I have. Everybody who is my dad’s age, male in the community, is my father by default — my uncles, all of them — and they dictate what my future is. 

So the news came, I applied to school and I was accepted to Randolph-Macon Woman’s College in Lynchburg, Virginia, and I couldn’t come without the support of the village, because I needed to raise money to buy the air ticket. I got a scholarship but I needed to get myself here. But I needed the support of the village, and here again, when the men heard, and the people heard that a woman had gotten an opportunity to go to school, they said,

“What a lost opportunity. This should have been given to a boy. We can’t do this.”

So I went back and I had to go back to the tradition. There’s a belief among our people that morning brings good news. So I had to come up with something to do with the morning because there’s good news in the morning. And in the village, also, there is one chief, an elder, who if he says yes, everybody will follow him. So I went to him very early in the morning, as the sun rose. The first thing he sees when he opens his door is, it’s me. 

“My child, what are you doing here?”

“Well, Dad, I need help. Can you support me to go to America? I promised him that I would be the best girl, I will come back, anything they wanted after that, I will do it for them. 

He said, “well, but I can’t do it alone.” He gave ma list of another 15 men that I went — 16 more men — every single morning I went and visited them. They all came together. The village, the women, the men, everybody came together to support me to come to get an education. 

I arrived in America. As you can imagine, what did I find? I found snow! I found Wal-Marts, vacuum cleaners, and lots of food in the cafeteria. I was in a land of plenty.

I enjoyed myself, but during that moment while I was here, I discovered a lot of things. I learned that that ceremony that I went through when I was 13 years old, it was called female genital mutilation  I learned that it was against the law in Kenya. I learned that I did not have to trade part of my body to get an education. I had a right. And as we speak now, three million girls in Africa are at risk of going through this mutilation. I learned that my mom had a right to own property. I learned that she did not have to be abused because she is a woman.

Those things made me angry. I wanted to do something.

As I went back, every time I went, I found that my neighbors’ girls were getting married. They were getting mutilated and here, after I graduated from here, I worked at the U.N., I went back to school to get my graduate work, the constant cry of these girls was on my face. I had to do something. 

As I went back… I spoke to the women, they told me, “You know what we need? We really need a school for girls.” Because there had not been any school for girls. And the reason they wanted the school for girls is because when a girl is raped when she’s walking to school, the mother is blamed for that. If she got pregnant before she got married, the mother is blamed for that, and she’s punished. She’s beaten. They said, “We wanted to put our girls in a safe place.”

As we moved, and I went to talk to the fathers, the fathers, of course, you can imagine what they said: “We want a school for boys.”

And I said, “Well, there are a couple of men from my village who have been out and they have gotten an education. Why can’t they build a school for boys, and I’ll build a school for girls?” That made sense. And they agreed. And I told them, I wanted them to show me as sign of commitment. And they did. They donated land where we built the girls’ school. We have.  

…as a new dawn is happening in my school, a new beginning is happening. As we speak right now, 125 girls will never be mutilated. One hundred twenty-five girls will not be married when they’re 12 years old. One hundred twenty-five girls are creating and achieving their dreams. This is the thing that we are doing, giving them opportunities where they can rise. As we speak right now, women are not being beaten because of the revolutions we’ve started in our community.” 

Ntaiya’s undergoes a very rough initiation, a rite of passage to become a woman, according to her culture. This ceremony was harmful to herself as well as the other girls who were told, and perhaps even forced to do so. She bargains the ceremony for continuing her education, and by doing so, her father also saves face. She does, on the other hand, feel a strong commitment to her community, and is determined to make positive change for other girls, so that they do not have to undergo that rite of passage.


1 Cognitive Dissonance – Simply Psychology. (2008). Simply Psychology. Retrieved March 26, 2013, from http://www.simplypsychology.org/cognitive-dissonance.html#sthash.mIzj3uz8.3XBdCh09.dpbs

Entry #7: Pavlov Classics

Topic: classical conditioning


In 1902, Ivan Pavlov, with the assistance with Ivan Tolochinov, studied the basis for what is now known as classical conditioning (also known as Pavlovian conditioning or respondent conditioning)1.

He noticed that his dog salivated when presented with food. If he rung a bell and presented the dog with food, the dog would of course salivate. He learned, however, that after some time of ringing the bell and presenting the dog with food, ringing the bell alone would cause the dog to salivate.

At a more abstract level, classical conditioning is a form of learning, in which a conditioned stimulus (CS), signals the occurrence of an unconditioned stimulus (US). Initially the CS usually results in no response, but after repeated trials it elicits a conditioned response (CR)2.

Schematically:

Food (US)

Salivation (UR)

Bell (CS)

+

Food (US)

Salivation( UR)

Bell (CS)

     +

Salivation (CR)

1) Food, the Unconditioned Stimulus, would lead to salivation, the Unconditioned Response

2) Ringing a bell (Conditioned Stimulus), and presenting food (US) would lead to salivation (UR)

3) Eventually, only ringing the bell (CS) would cause the dog to salivate (CR)

In this way, the dog had been “conditioned” to expect something to follow a certain stimulus.

~

Now that the basics have been delineated. Let’s look at a few (humorous) examples.

  • CS: “That Was Easy” sound effect
  • US: Shooting with air soft gun
  • UR: flinching
  • CR: flinching when hearing “that was easy” sound effect alone

~

Lazarus_C_Conditioning

~

Snoopy

~

pavlovs_dog

~

And one last example from The Office

  • CS: Sound effect
  • US: Asking Dwight if he wants a mint
  • UR: Holding out hand
  • CR: holding hand out when hearing sound, and bad taste in mouth

1 Ivan Pavlov – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Pavlov

2 Classical Conditioning – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. (n.d.). Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved March 21, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning

Entry #6: On Beauty

Topic: Impressions, group perception, the self


Cameron Russel addresses beauty and it’s effect on her life in her TED talk, “Looks aren’t everything, believe me, I’m a model” (full video included at the end).

She begins, walking on stage in high heels and a body hugging dress, “Hi. My name is Cameron Russel, and for the last little while I’ve been a model. Actually, for 10 years. And I feel like there’s an uncomfortable tension in the room right now because I should not have worn this dress.

So luckily I brought an outfit change. This is the first outfit change on the TED stage, so you guys are pretty lucky to witness it, I think. If some of the women were really horrified when I came out, you don’t have to tell me now, but I’ll find out later on Twitter.

I’d also note that I am quite privileged to be able to transform what you think of me in a very brief 10 seconds. Not everybody gets to do that,” she says charismatically  whilst changing into more comfortable clothes and low heeled shoes.

Continuing, “So why did I do that? That was awkward. 

Image is powerful, but also, image is superficial

I just totally transformed what you thought of me in six seconds… And of course, barring surgery, or the fake tan that I got two days ago for work, there’s very little that we can do to transform how we look. And, how we look, though it is superficial and immutable, has a huge impact on our lives. 

So today, for me, being fearless means being honest. And I am on this stage because I am a model. I am on this stage because I am a pretty, white woman, and in my industry we call that a sexy girl. And I’m going to answer the questions that people always ask me, but with an honest twist. 

So, the first question is, how do you become a model? And I always just say, “Oh, I was scouted,” but that means nothing. The real way that I became a model is I won a genetic lottery, and I am the recipient of a legacy, and maybe you’re wondering what is a legacy.

Well, for the past few centuries we have defined beauty not just as health and youth and symmetry that we’re biologically programmed to admire, but also as tall, slender figures, and femininity and white skin. And this is a legacy that was built for me, and it’s a legacy that I’ve been cashing out on. 

And I know there are people in the audience who are skeptical at this point, and maybe there are some fashionistas who are, like, “Wait. Naomi. Tyra. Joan Smalls. Liu Wen.” And first, I commend you on your model knowledge. Very impressive. 

But unfortunately I have to inform you that in 2007, a very inspired NYU Ph.D. student counted all the models on the runway, every single one that was hired, and of the 677 models that were hired, only 27, or less than four percent, were non-white.

The next questions people always ask me is, “Can I be a model when I grow up?” And the first answer is, “I don’t know, they don’t put me in charge of that.” But the second answer, and what I really want to say to these little girls is, “Why? You know? You can be anything…

Saying that you want to be a model when you grow up is akin to saying that you want to win the Powerball when you grow up. It’s out of your control, and it’s awesome, and it’s not a career path…

The next question people always ask me is, “Do they retouch all the photos?” And yeah, they pretty much retouch all the photos, but that is only a small component of what’s happening… Here’s me on the soccer team and in V Magazine. And here’s me today. And I hope what you’re seeing is that these pictures are not pictures of me. They are constructions, and they are constructions by a group of professionals, by hairstylists and makeup artists and photographers and stylists and all of their assistants and pre-production and post-production, and they build this.

This is not me. 

Okay, so the next question people always ask me is, “Do you get free stuff?” I do have too many 8-inch heels, which I never get to wear, except for earlier, but the free stuff that I get is the free stuff that I get in real life, and that’s what we don’t like to talk about. I grew up in Cambridge, and one time I went into a store and I forgot my money and they gave me the dress for free. 

When I was a teenager, I was driving with my friend who was an awful driver and she ran a red and of course, we got pulled over, and all it took was a “Sorry, Officer,” and we were on our way.

And I got these free things because of how I look, not who I am, and there are people paying a cost for how they look and not who they are…

When I was researching this talk, I found out that of the 13-year-old girls in the United States, 53% don’t like their bodies, and that number goes to 78% by the that they’re 17…

So when I was writing this talk, I found it very difficult to strike an honest balance, because on one hand, I felt very uncomfortable to come out here and say, “Look I’ve received all these benefits from a deck stacked in my favor,” and it also felt uncomfortable to follow that up with, “and it doesn’t always make me happy.” But mostly it was difficult to unpack a legacy of gender and racial oppression when I am one of the biggest beneficiaries…

If there’s a takeaway to this talk, I hope it’s that we all feel more comfortable acknowledging the power of image in our perceived successes and our perceived failures.”

I found intriguing because it forces one to consider beauty, and what that means in society, how it is portrayed in magazines (or some other medium) by industry and how those are constructions that do not reflect reality. The talk also highlights several social psychology points.

To start, impression formation is influenced greatly by appearance. A lot of social categorization is based on physical features, and when first meeting someone, a lot of the initial information that is gathered is visual, including gender, perceived age, height. These salient physical attributes are what determine attractiveness.

There are a few stereotypes that accompany categories of physical beauty.

The Halo effect, for instance, is the idea that when a person is attractive there is a halo of goodness that enhances their other characteristics, when gathering first impressions. For instance, in politics, the taller candidate is usually preferred (height for men being associated with physical attraction). In the classroom, teachers pay more attention to cute kids, or rate them as more intelligent. In parenting, parents attend more to cute babies, then unattractive babies. By referring to the physical attractiveness of the subject, there is an assumption that they are good, because what is beautiful is good, right? So, vote for that politician because he is tall, and that somehow means he is also competent. Pay attention to the cuter kids because it somehow means they are more capable. In her talk, Russel gives the examples of getting free dresses and not getting ticketed for running red lights (noted that it wasn’t her driving), on the basis of a “genetic lottery,” that endowed her with features society has labeled as beautiful.

She also brings up issues on how groups are perceived, also on the basis of looks. Referring several times to receiving benefits solely on the basis of her looks, she also highlights how other people are discriminated on the basis of their looks (excerpts not included above). She notes that, while living in New York, one year 140,000 teenagers were stopped and frisked. Of those teenagers, 86% of them were black and Latino, most of them being young men. She follows this statistic with another, “and there are only 177,000 young Black and Latino men in New York, so for them, it’s not a question of ‘Will I get stopped?’ But ‘How many times will I get stopped’.”

Lastly, she talks about the self, highlighting that the self is not only a representation of one’s physical appearance. And having an attractive façade does not mean that one doesn’t feel insecurity, though it may be perceived that way. I found it interesting how she emphasized that modeling is her job, and the product of modeling is a construction, not a reflection of her life, or of reality. So, when comparing yourself to pictures in a magazine, it’s wise to understand the difference between real and fabricated in a ploy to sell issues, and get you to buy whatever products went into structuring that fabrication. But, in the end, though image is powerful, it is not the whole story.